New Racial Profiling Case from the Ontario Court of Appeal
Maya Shukairy • Aug 23, 2019

The Ontario Court of Appeal released the decision in R . v. Dudhi , 2019 ONCA 665. The decision is about racial profiling, a concept which sadly seems to be recurrent in criminal law.

The Concept Of Racial Profiling

In Dudhi , Justice Paciocco writing for the Court, explains the concept of racial profiling as having two components : (1) an attitudinal component; and (2) a causation component (par. 54 of the decision).


The attitudinal component is the acceptance by a person in authority that race or racial stereotypes are relevant in identifying the propensity to offend or to be dangerous. The causation component requires that this race-based thinking must consciously or unconsciously play a causal role. Meaning, race or the racial stereotype must motivate or influence, to any degree , decisions by persons in authority regarding suspect selection or subject treatment (par. 55).

Race Being A Factor For Arrest

The idea that race must motivate the decision of persons in authority to any degree is important, because this means that if race was a factor in the police officer’s thinking during his police actions, then that would satisfy the causation component even if the officer had reasonable grounds to arrest a person. In the context of the case of Dudhi , the police officer made a racist comment about Mr. Dudhi after he had already formed grounds to arrest him. The argument was being made that given that the racist comment about Mr. Dudhi’s skin colour was made after there was reason to arrest Mr. Dudhi, his racist thinking could not have affected his action and decision to arrest. The Ontario Court of Appeal rejected that argument and indicated that the comment reflected an attitude or belief, and attitudes or beliefs do not come and go in the moment. They are held (par. 78).

Where race is used to any degree in suspect selection or subject treatment, there will be no reasonable suspicion or reasonable grounds. The decision will amount to racial profiling (par. 63) and racial profiling has two components, an attitudinal component and a causation one.

About The Author

Maya Shukairy is a criminal defence lawyer based in Ottawa, Ontario. Before becoming a criminal defence lawyer, she worked in a Crown’s Office gaining experience working as a Crown prosecutor. Maya offers her services in English, French and Arabic. Shukairy Law has affordable rates and accepts Legal Aid certificates.

Find this post informative?

Share it with your friends and family.

CAUTION: the information on this page does not constitute legal advice and is NOT a substitute for legal advice. To obtain legal advice please refer to a lawyer. If you do not have a lawyer and you are seeking legal advice, you may contact us at (613) 670-5819.

Take a look at a few other posts...



by Maya Shukairy 09 Aug, 2023
The Supreme Court of Canada released on July 28th, 2023 its decision in R. v. Kahsai, 2023 SCC 20. In this decision the Court clarifies the role of amicus in criminal proceedings. Maya Shukairy was one of the lawyers representing the intervener the Empowerment Council.
a mobile phone with social media apps
by Maya Shukairy 15 Nov, 2022
Learn more about how social media can be used as evidence, the use of electronic data in criminal cases and the law in Ontario surrounding text messages.
woman holding sign reading
by Maya Shukairy 10 Nov, 2022
This post is currently focused around the George Floyd story and includes an interview with Maya by Zyad Tariq Rasheed (Arabic language).
More Posts >>
Share by: